Movie Trailers CanMag Title Bar
CanMag RSS Feeds
CanMag's Index of Films How Are Films Selected?

Couple of Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire Reviews

Published November 6, 2005 in Early Reviews
By Ryan Parsons | Images property of Warner Bros
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire Poster Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
I am sure we can soon expect a ton of early reviews for Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire pop up at the same rate that the reviews for Revenge of the Sith did. Not that I am comparing the two films in the slightest, but GOF should have equivalent hype [at least] when the film enters theatres.

Goblet of Fire Movie Reviews


Check out two additional early movie reviews for the upcoming film Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. Though both say tons of great things about the film, both reviews dock off a few marks [actually, Times only gives GOF three out of five stars. According to one of the reviews, Goblet of Fire just tries to be too funny.

TIMES
What’s fresh about the Goblet of Fire is the intriguing tension between the feeble and the strong. This has always been Rowling’s tug of war. The playground duels between Harry and his peers are as bitter as ever, but there’s a delicious sense of anarchy about boarding school life. For the first time we sense what makes Harry tick under pressure.

There are plenty of old familiar staples for fans: the unsporting cut-and-thrust of a Quidditch World Cup; a maze that stretches for ever; and a mission impossible at the bottom of a lake. The Dursleys are sadly missing. But one can’t have everything. The red-herrings are worth hanging on a wall. Brendan Gleeson’s Mad-Eye Moody is the latest loose cannon on the staff. It’s impossible to fault the shades; I’d like to bid for the marble eyeball.



AICN
And what a ride it is. Clocking in at 2.5 hours, this is a great film - unquestionably the best of the series thus far. Personal opinion - it's also the best book of the series. I could have watched another hour and not gotten bored.

Potter fans will note there is A LOT missing from the book. But c'mon, it's about 700 pages. Of course they're gonna have to chop some stuff, otherwise the movie would be five hours (I wouldn't complain, myself). But while many things have been left out, nothing feels like it's missing. The movie stands on it's own very well.

The one downside is it seemslike the makers took every opportunity to inject humor in. While I can understand why they felt it necessary (it is a kid's movie, after all), and a lot of it does work, there are some little tidbits that seem to be there with no other purpose than to provide a light moment, which kind of takes you out of the intensity of the movie. Some of those could go, but I get why it was felt they were needed.

And seriously, that's my only criticism. It's a great film. Gotta give it a B+ easily. Lose just a bit of the unnecessary humor, and it's totally in the A range.


It has been confirmed that the Dursley's do not make an appearance in Goblet of Fire. However, at least the opening dream sequence from the book still exists.

To read either of the new reviews for Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, click on the orange links [open in new window].

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire comes to theatres on November 18th.

For the trailers, movie stills, movie posters other reviews and synopsis, go to the Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire Movie Page.

Stay tuned for updates.


You Like? (Bookmarks)
Add to Heffee!
Compiled By (Sources)
Ryan Parsons
Sources: Images property of Warner Bros
Contact

Related Articles
© 2004 Minds Eye One, All Rights Reserved
The Can Magazine™ is a trademark of Minds Eye One
All movie titles, movie icons, movie stills/clips/trailers/other media... are registered trademarks and/or copyrights of stated holders
CanMag.Com banners contain movie/gaming icons that were created by individual holders
Home > Movies > Couple of Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire Reviews
Search

CanMag Web